Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.31 seconds)Haryana State Adhyapak Sangh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 21 February, 1990
4. Be it stated that even though no counteraffidavit had been filed by the state in theHigh Court and a concession was madeby the counsel appearing for the state, statingthat the circular dated 8.2.1994 is inrelation to the scale of pay of a teacher, inthe special leave petitions filed in this Courtby the state, no ground had been taken that no such concession had been made.Though in course of hearing of these appeals,Mr. Anand vehemently contendedthat the concession on a question of lawshould not bind the state in assailing thatconcession in this Court and further the circulardated 8.2.1994 is in the nature of astagnation/promotion policy intended forthose employees who have not been ableto get higher promotion notwithstandinghaving rendered certain years of serviceand, therefore, the benefits flowing fromsuch circular cannot be conferred on theteachers of privately managed schools, buton examining the circular dated 8.2.1994,which was annexed as Annexure P-7 tothe writ petition filed before the High Court,we have no manner of doubt that it relatesto a higher scale of pay and, therefore, inour considered opinion, the concession ofthe state counsel before the High Court waswell founded and we see no infirmity withthe impugned judgment of the High Courtproceeding on the basis of the aforesaidconcession. The Court in HaryanaAdhyapak Sangh's case (supra) has unequivocallyindicated that the teachers ofaided schools must be paid the same scaleand dearness allowance as teachers ofgovernment schools.
1