Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.35 seconds)
Pawan Kumar More vs Shri Radha Krishan Poddar (Deceased) on 13 February, 2020 cites

Radha Krishan Sanatan Dharam College & ... vs Pawan Kumar & Ors on 14 September, 2018

32. In view of above discussion, question (B) is answered as follows. The tenants Shri V.C. Jain of premises no. 5179A and Shri Pawan Kumar More & Shri Ashok Kumar More of premises no. 5179B did not pay RCT No. 30279/2016 Pawan Kumar More &ors. vs Radha Kishan Poddar RCT No. 30280/2016 V.C. Jain vs Radha Kishan Poddar Page 30 of 41 pages RCT No. 30372/2016 Radha Kishan Poddar vs V.C. Jain RCT No. 30376/2016 Radha Kishan Poddar vs Pawan Kumar More &ors. complete outstanding rent despite service of demand notices till institution of the eviction petitions.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Sriram Pasricha vs Jagannath & Ors on 24 August, 1976

In the case of Subhendu Prosad (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reiterated that even assuming the quit notice was not given on behalf of one of the co­owner landlords, the decision in RCT No. 30279/2016 Pawan Kumar More &ors. vs Radha Kishan Poddar RCT No. 30280/2016 V.C. Jain vs Radha Kishan Poddar Page 21 of 41 pages RCT No. 30372/2016 Radha Kishan Poddar vs V.C. Jain RCT No. 30376/2016 Radha Kishan Poddar vs Pawan Kumar More &ors. the case of Sriram Pasricha (supra) would show that yet the notice was good and valid.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 439 - P K Goswami - Full Document

Pawan Kumar Gupta vs B.R. Gupta on 9 May, 2017

7.3 Learned counsel for landlords placed reliance on the judgments in the cases of Mohinder Prasad Jain vs Manohar Lal Jain, (2006) 2 SCC 724; E. Palanisamy vs Palanisamy (Dead) by LRs & Ors., (2003) 1 SCC 123; C.L. Nagpal vs Dharam Pal Singh & Ors., MANU/DE/0488/1985; Rakesh Kumar vs Gandharv Singh, MANU/DE/1459/2008; Manohar Lal (Deceased) through legal heirs vs Prem Nath Gera (Deceased) through legal heirs, in CMM No. 638/2011 decided on 24th May 2011; B.R. Gupta vs Pawan Kumar Gupta in CM(M) No. 415 of 2012 decided on 01.12.2014; Pawan Kumar Gupta vs B.R. Gupta, in civil appeal No. 6461 of 2017 decided on 09.05.2017; Sayeda Akhtar vs Abdulahad, 2003 Supp (1) SCR 612; Sriram Pasricha vs Jagannath & Ors., 1976 AIR 2335; Subhendu Prosad vs Kamla Bala Roy Choudhary, AIR 1978 SC 835; Kanta Goel vs B.P. Pathak & Ors., 1977 AIR 1599; Dineshchandra Chunnilal vs Thakkar Chottalal Popatlal, 1979 1 GLR 832; Delhi Automobiles & Ltd. vs Kishan Gopal RCT No. 30279/2016 Pawan Kumar More &ors. vs Radha Kishan Poddar RCT No. 30280/2016 V.C. Jain vs Radha Kishan Poddar Page 17 of 41 pages RCT No. 30372/2016 Radha Kishan Poddar vs V.C. Jain RCT No. 30376/2016 Radha Kishan Poddar vs Pawan Kumar More &ors. Ahuja & Anr., RSA No. 98/2008 & SM Nos.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 15 - S A Nazeer - Full Document

Subhendu Prosad Roy Choudhury And Ors. vs Kamala Bala Roy Choudhury And Ors. on 1 February, 1978

In the case of Subhendu Prosad (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reiterated that even assuming the quit notice was not given on behalf of one of the co­owner landlords, the decision in RCT No. 30279/2016 Pawan Kumar More &ors. vs Radha Kishan Poddar RCT No. 30280/2016 V.C. Jain vs Radha Kishan Poddar Page 21 of 41 pages RCT No. 30372/2016 Radha Kishan Poddar vs V.C. Jain RCT No. 30376/2016 Radha Kishan Poddar vs Pawan Kumar More &ors. the case of Sriram Pasricha (supra) would show that yet the notice was good and valid.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 16 - N L Untwalia - Full Document
1   2 3 Next