Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.46 seconds)Section 141 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 142 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan vs The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 26 April, 2022
12. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan vs. State
(Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Another10 has observed and held as under:
National Small Industries Corp.Ltd vs Harmeet Singh Paintal & Anr on 15 February, 2010
Interpreting the provisions of Section 141 this Court in National Small
Industries Corpn. Ltd. v. Harmeet Singh Paintal [National Small Industries
Corpn. Ltd. v. Harmeet Singh Paintal, (2010) 3 SCC 330 : (2010) 1 SCC (Civ)
677 : (2010) 2 SCC (Cri) 1113] observed that Section 141 is a penal provision
creating vicarious liability, and which, as per settled law, must be strictly
construed. It is therefore, not sufficient to make a bald cursory statement in a
complaint that the Director (arrayed as an accused) is in charge of and
responsible to the Company for the conduct of business of the Company
without anything more as to the role of the Director. But the complaint should
spell out as to how and in what manner the accused was in charge of or was
responsible to the Company for the conduct of its business. This is in
consonance with strict interpretation of penal statutes especially where such
statutes create vicarious liability.
M/S Meters And Instruments Private ... vs Kanchan Mehta on 5 October, 2017
a) Meters and Instruments Private Limited and Another vs.
Kanchan Mehta5
5
(2018) 1 SCC 560
Vijay Gopala Lohar vs Pandurang Ramchandra Ghorpade . on 5 April, 2019
b) The Complaint Case no. 2823/2019 and the impugned order dated
20.06.2019 are quashed qua petitioner no. 2.