Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)Sunil Bharti Mittal vs Cbi on 9 January, 2015
In view of the observations made by Hon'ble Supreme Court in
LOVLEEN
Sunil Bharti Mittal (supra), Lalan Kumar Singh (Supra) and by the Hon'ble
Delhi High Court in Vikas Thakur (Supra), it would be appropriate that the
Digitally signed
by LOVLEEN
Date:
impugned order dated 26.09.2022 be set aside. Ordered accordingly.
Lalankumar Singh vs The State Of Maharashtra on 11 October, 2022
In view of the observations made by Hon'ble Supreme Court in
LOVLEEN
Sunil Bharti Mittal (supra), Lalan Kumar Singh (Supra) and by the Hon'ble
Delhi High Court in Vikas Thakur (Supra), it would be appropriate that the
Digitally signed
by LOVLEEN
Date:
impugned order dated 26.09.2022 be set aside. Ordered accordingly.
Section 288 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
V P Aggarwal vs Cbi on 21 October, 2013
4. Girdhir Lal Mohta vs CBI 2013 SCC OnLine Del
Digitally signed 4172 and
by LOVLEEN
Date: 2024.09.27
15:16:54 +0530
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Vikas Thakur vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 14 September, 2023
In view of the observations made by Hon'ble Supreme Court in
LOVLEEN
Sunil Bharti Mittal (supra), Lalan Kumar Singh (Supra) and by the Hon'ble
Delhi High Court in Vikas Thakur (Supra), it would be appropriate that the
Digitally signed
by LOVLEEN
Date:
impugned order dated 26.09.2022 be set aside. Ordered accordingly.