Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.51 seconds)THE TELANGANA STATE BUILDING PERMISSION APPROVAL AND SELF CERTIFICATION SYSTEM (TS-bPASS) ACT, 2020
The Right to Information Act, 2005
O.P.Sharma & Ors vs High Court Of Punjab & Haryana on 9 May, 2011
15. At this juncture, it is appropriate to echo the words of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in O.P. Sharma and Ors. v. High Court
of Punjab and Haryana 1, wherein it was held that violation of
professional ethics is not only unfortunate but it is also
unacceptable. Further, it is also appropriate to note that an
advocate is conferred with a senior designation under Section 16
of the Advocates Act, 1961 not only for his expertise and
experience in a field of. law, but also while considering his
professional ethics and whether he would be deserving of such
distinction. It goes without saying that a designated senior
counsel is expected to lead the younger members of the bar by
1
(2011) 6 SCC 86
8
example. However, it appears that we are now at the cusp of an
age where the Senior officers of this Court are setting precedent
that the wheels of justice can be bogged down by misbehavior.
Therefore, the incident before this Court sends out a message
that there is an alarming need to relook at the existing process for
conferring a Senior Designation.
K. Ramadas Shenoy vs The Chief Officers, Town Municipal ... on 9 August, 1974
It can only be a
matter of imagination how much the government has to spend on the
treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and
adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the
roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorized
constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance
of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws
and emphasized that no compromise should be made with the
town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator
of the town planning scheme etc. on the ground that he has spent
12
substantial amount on construction of the buildings etc. - K.
Ramdas Shenoy v. Chief Officers, Town Municipal Council,
UdipiMANU/SC/0082/1974 : 1974 (2) SCC 506;Dr. G.N. Khajuria
v. Delhi Development Authority MANU/SC/0064/1996 : 1995 (5)
SCC 762;M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu
MANU/SC/0999/1999 : 1999 (6) SCC 464; Friends Colony
Development Committee v. State of Orissa MANU/SC/0933/2004 :
Dr. G.N. Khajuria & Ors vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors on 31 August, 1995
It can only be a
matter of imagination how much the government has to spend on the
treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and
adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the
roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorized
constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance
of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws
and emphasized that no compromise should be made with the
town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator
of the town planning scheme etc. on the ground that he has spent
12
substantial amount on construction of the buildings etc. - K.
Ramdas Shenoy v. Chief Officers, Town Municipal Council,
UdipiMANU/SC/0082/1974 : 1974 (2) SCC 506;Dr. G.N. Khajuria
v. Delhi Development Authority MANU/SC/0064/1996 : 1995 (5)
SCC 762;M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu
MANU/SC/0999/1999 : 1999 (6) SCC 464; Friends Colony
Development Committee v. State of Orissa MANU/SC/0933/2004 :
M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd vs Radhey Shyam Sahu And Others on 26 July, 1999
It can only be a
matter of imagination how much the government has to spend on the
treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and
adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the
roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorized
constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance
of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws
and emphasized that no compromise should be made with the
town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator
of the town planning scheme etc. on the ground that he has spent
12
substantial amount on construction of the buildings etc. - K.
Ramdas Shenoy v. Chief Officers, Town Municipal Council,
UdipiMANU/SC/0082/1974 : 1974 (2) SCC 506;Dr. G.N. Khajuria
v. Delhi Development Authority MANU/SC/0064/1996 : 1995 (5)
SCC 762;M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu
MANU/SC/0999/1999 : 1999 (6) SCC 464; Friends Colony
Development Committee v. State of Orissa MANU/SC/0933/2004 :
Friends Colony Development Committee vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 1 November, 2004
It can only be a
matter of imagination how much the government has to spend on the
treatment of such persons and also for controlling pollution and
adverse impact on the environment due to traffic congestion on the
roads and chaotic conditions created due to illegal and unauthorized
constructions. This Court has, from time to time, taken cognizance
of buildings constructed in violation of municipal and other laws
and emphasized that no compromise should be made with the
town planning scheme and no relief should be given to the violator
of the town planning scheme etc. on the ground that he has spent
12
substantial amount on construction of the buildings etc. - K.
Ramdas Shenoy v. Chief Officers, Town Municipal Council,
UdipiMANU/SC/0082/1974 : 1974 (2) SCC 506;Dr. G.N. Khajuria
v. Delhi Development Authority MANU/SC/0064/1996 : 1995 (5)
SCC 762;M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu
MANU/SC/0999/1999 : 1999 (6) SCC 464; Friends Colony
Development Committee v. State of Orissa MANU/SC/0933/2004 :
S.N. Chandrashekar And Anr vs State Of Karnataka And Ors on 2 February, 2006
2004 (8) SCC 733;M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
MANU/SC/8028/2006 : 2006 (3) SCC 399 andS.N. Chandrasekhar
v. State of Karnataka MANU/SC/8005/2006 : 2006 (3) SCC 208.
Anisa Apartment Co-Operative Housing ... vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 15 January, 2019
22. Further, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Esha Ekta
Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and Ors. Vs.
Municipal Corporation of Mumbai and Ors 3, held that
3
(2013) 5 SCC 357
13
Constitutional Courts ought to exercise their equitable
jurisdiction to regularize illegal and unauthorized constructions.
The relevant observations are as under: