Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)

State Bank Of Patiala & Ors vs S.K.Sharma on 27 March, 1996

17 The Honourable Supreme Court in the case of the State Bank of Patiala v/s S.K.Sharma, AIR 1996 SC 1669, has distinguished between the procedural rights and substantive rights of the delinquent who is subjected to disciplinary proceedings. The Apex Court has concluded that unless substantive rights flowing from the Service Law are not violated, an enquiry is not to be set aside only if there are procedural flaws. In the face of the contention that material rights of the delinquent are infringed, the Honourable Apex Court has laid down that these contentions have to be ::: Uploaded on - 10/08/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2016 00:01:15 ::: *11* 904.wp.2764.16 tested on the touchstone of prejudice and the onus and burden lies on the delinquent to establish the prejudice.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 1234 - B P Reddy - Full Document

M/S Siddheshwar Urban Coop Bank Ltd ... vs Ganesh Tejrao Bangale on 24 February, 2016

11 Insofar as the contention of the Petitioner that evidence in written form must carry a verification is concerned, this issue is no longer res-integra. This Court in the matter of M/s Siddheshwar Urban Cooperative Bank Limited vs. Ganesh Tejrao Bangale, 2016 (2) Mh.L.J. 880, has settled the issue that evidence of any witness in the enquiry is to be recorded either by way of a narration or in a concise form of what has ::: Uploaded on - 10/08/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2016 00:01:15 ::: *8* 904.wp.2764.16 been stated. It is also held that evidence of any witness can be presented in writing before the Enquiry Officer and that would, in fact, be beneficial to both the sides because it would eliminate the possibility of missing any point and insofar as the cross-examination is concerned, the delinquent-
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 4 - R V Ghuge - Full Document
1