Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.21 seconds)

State Of Haryana And Anr. vs Rattan Singh on 22 March, 1977

15. It is also revealed from the records that the Inquiry Officer had twice requested the concerned passengers to participate in the inquiry but despite the said efforts, the passengers did not come forward to get their statements recorded. Therefore, since an effort was made, despite which passenger witnesses could not be examined, the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. Rattan Singh (Supra) squarely applies to the facts of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 650 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Delhi Transport Corporation vs N.L. Kakkar Presiding Officer, ... on 17 March, 2004

The aforesaid decision of this Court as also the decision of the Supreme Court in Rattan Singh (supra) and many other decisions were noticed by this Court in the decision in Delhi Transport Corporation v. N.L. Kakkar and Anr. reported as 110 (2004) DLT 493. After noticing all the judgments, this Court held that consistent view of the courts over the last few years has been that non- production of passenger witnesses is not fatal to the domestic inquiry and that findings of fact arrived at in a domestic inquiry should not be interfered with so long as they are based on some evidence. In the said judgment this Court also noted the law laid down by some other High Courts and on such consideration it was held that production of passengers either in a domestic inquiry or before the Labour Court in an industrial dispute is not at all necessary. This Court was of the view that in most cases this would be highly impractical because it would mean that passengers would have to be traced out, chased and brought before the inquiry officer or the Labour Court causing them unnecessary inconvenience. We are of the considered opinion that all the aforesaid decisions are fully applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 40 - M B Lokur - Full Document
1