Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Coinage Act, 2011
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Basant Kumar And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 12 September, 1996
Under such circumstances, in the considered
opinion of this Court, the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court
in case of Basant Kumar (supra) would not advance the cause of the
respondent.
Section 28 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Mohammad Raofuddin vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 13 April, 2009
9.3. Now, considering the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
case of Mohammad Raofuddin (supra), it would appear that in
absence of any sale deed judgement and award passed in respect of
the acquisition of the lands made in the same village or nearby
villages can be accepted as a valid piece of evidence, which provides
a sound basis to determine market value of the land. In the instant
case, it would appear that the lands, which had been acquired in the
same village for albeit for a different purpose had been valued by the
Reference Court at the rate of Rs.300/- per sq. mtrs., as against Rs.6/-
per sq. mtrs., awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. It would be
to this Court absolutely unfair not to rely upon the said decision and
grant the same benefit as regards land acquired in the very village,
albeit for a different purpose. Again as observed by the Hon'ble
Apex Court, the method of relying upon the judgements and award
passed in respect of acquisition of lands made in the same village is a
valid piece of evidence to determine the market value of the land.
1