Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.27 seconds)
Satpal Venaik vs Mrs. Usha Khurana on 8 February, 2013 cites

Suraj Lamp & Industries (P) Ld.Tr.Dir vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 11 October, 2011

Another aspect taken note of in the impugned order and which was canvassed before us arises from the judgment of the Supreme Court in Suraj Lamp & Industries Private Limited (2) Through Director Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (2012) 1 SCC 656. The execution of Agreement to sell & purchase coupled with collateral documents like GPA, SPA, Will, etc. has been a common practice in Delhi. The validity of such a practice has been examined in the said judgment and it has been held that the bunch of such documents cannot be recognized as deeds of title, "except to the limited Suit no. 49/11 Pg... 11 of 13 r
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 1760 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Ajay Goel vs K.K.Bhandari & Ors. on 13 February, 2012

In the case of Ajay Goel Vs. K.K.Bhandari & Ors. 76 (1998) DLT 147, it was held that the plaintiff in that case who was seeking cancellation of certain documents as void failed to establish his title to the disputed property and he was admittedly not in possession of the property, the prayer of the plaintiff that the sale deed, power of attorney and documents of transfer of property in favour of defendant no.1 by other defendants seeking cancellation of documents was held not maintainable since plaintiff should have filed a suit for delivery of possession. It was held that the plaintiff failed to establish his title to the disputed property and even if the documents were held to be void and declared cancelled, still no benefit can be derived by the plaintiff either with regard to the title of the suit property or with regard to the possession and therefore, decree cannot be granted.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 11 - P Rani - Full Document
1