Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)Section 2 in The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Ram Pratap Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Ors. on 27 August, 2014
4. It is also seen from the statement of facts made in the
writ petition that in the present case the order of the Deputy
Director of Consolidation was challenged before another Deputy
Director and the impugned order was passed. The learned Single
Judge had also relied upon a decision of this Court in the case of
Ram Pratap Singh v. State of Bihar reported in 2007 (1) PLJR
57,
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1215 of 2018(10) dt.05-12-2023
Sri Rameshwar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 16 March, 2018
5. The cited decision relied on Ramotar Yadav v. the
State of Bihar 2001 (1) PLJR 266, which held that "the power of
revision and reference vested in the Director of Consolidation
under Section 35 of the Act can at best be exercised only by any of
such authorities as defined under sub-section (4) of Section 2
which does not include the Deputy Director of Consolidation"
1