Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)
Raju Sebastian vs Union Of India on 10 October, 2018 cites

Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) And Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 24 August, 2017

Relying on the decisions of the Apex Court in District Registrar and Collector v. Canara Bank [(2005)1 SCC 496], Ram Rethmalani v. Union of India [(2011)8 SCC 1] and K.S.Puttaswamy's case (supra), learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that the compulsory requirement that the petitioners should furnish private information relating to them for the continuance of the licence agreement is completely unjustified and is violative of their valuable right to privacy.
Supreme Court of India Cites 294 - Cited by 384 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Distt. Registrar & Collector, ... vs Canara Bank Etc on 1 November, 2004

Relying on the decisions of the Apex Court in District Registrar and Collector v. Canara Bank [(2005)1 SCC 496], Ram Rethmalani v. Union of India [(2011)8 SCC 1] and K.S.Puttaswamy's case (supra), learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that the compulsory requirement that the petitioners should furnish private information relating to them for the continuance of the licence agreement is completely unjustified and is violative of their valuable right to privacy.
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 130 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1