Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)

M/S Kamakhya Plastics (P) Ltd vs The State Of Assam & 4 Ors on 17 March, 2011

In the present matter, the show cause notice for re-assessment was issued after eight years of the concerned Assessment but the Revenue justifies the exercise on the authority of the pronouncement in Kamakhya Plastics (P) Ltd. (supra). But the High Court while permitting the State to recover tax which escaped assessment, through retrospective application of the concessional rate notification of 03.01.2003, did not simultaneously allow the State to exercise their taxing power in situations, where the right to recovery stood extinguished by operation of law. Hence it is clear that the verdict relied on by the respondent counsel can't be applied blindly to every situation of tax escapement.
Gauhati High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

State Of West Bengal vs Kesoram Industries Ltd. And Ors on 15 January, 2004

13. In order to adjudicate on the legality of the additional tax demand, it is necessary to bear in mind that equitable consideration are out of place and Revn. Petition No.17/2014 & Revn. Petition No.18/2014 4 of 6 "taxation statute is to be strictly construed" (Principle Of Statutory Interpretation by Justice G.P. Singh). Referring to the general principles of taxation, the Constitution Bench in State of West Bengal vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd., reported in AIR 2005 SC 1646, settled the legal position with the following words:
Supreme Court of India Cites 258 - Cited by 433 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1