Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.32 seconds)

M.Sajjanraj Nahar vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax on 1 February, 2006

02.11.2011 for copy of sworn statement recorded in survey operation and admitted =10,00,000/- to tax. The ld. Assessing Officer relied on the decision of jurisdictional High Court in the case of M. Sajjanraj Nahar vs. CIT 155 Taxman 536 (Mad)/283 ITR 230 and minimum penalty of =3,39,900/- u/s.271(1) (c) of the Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars and concealment of income to the extent of =10,00,000/-. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
Madras High Court Cites 48 - Cited by 28 - Full Document
1