Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.65 seconds)
Kirti V. Ambani vs Union Of India on 10 July, 2014 cites

Mohanlal Shamji Soni vs Union Of India And Another on 22 February, 1991

In Mohanlal Shamji Soni v. Union of India and Anr. 1991CriLJ1521 it was observed that it is a cardinal rule in the law of evidence that the best available evidence should be brought before the Court to prove a fact or the points in issue. But it is left either for the prosecution or for the defence to establish its respective case by adducing the best available evidence and the Court is not empowered under the provisions of the Code to compel either the prosecution or the defence to examine any particular witness or witnesses on their sides. It is the duty of a Court not only to do justice but also to ensure that justice is being done. It was further held that the second part of the Section does not allow for any discretion but it binds and compels the Court to take any of the aforementioned two steps if the fresh evidence to be obtained is essential to the just decision of the case. It was emphasized that power is circumscribed by the principle that underlines Section 311 Cr.P.C, namely, evidence to be obtained should appear to the court essential to a just decision of the case by getting at the truth by all lawful means. Further, that the power must be used judicially and not capriciously or arbitrarily. It was further observed that evidence should not be received as a disguise for a retrial or to change the nature of the case against either of the parties and the discretion of the Court must obviously be dictated by exigency of the situation and fair play and good sense appear to be the safe guides and that only the requirement of justice command the examination of any person which would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case........"
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 571 - S R Pandian - Full Document
1   2 3 Next