Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)

Abdurehiman vs Sethu Madhavan on 30 August, 2006

15. A Division Bench of this Court, in Abdurehiman v. Sethu Madhavan : 2006 (4) KLT 33, has held that, while entertaining an application for condonation of delay under Section 142 of the Act, there is not even a requirement that the complainant should file an affidavit in support of the petition for condonation of delay. Court is conferred with the discretion to waive the period of one month prescribed for taking cognizance. When a court is invested with discretionary power, it has to make a choice between alternative courses of action and act according to the rules of reason and justice.
1