Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)

A. Venkatesan And Ors. vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors. on 11 February, 2004

2. The brief facts of the case are that the Decree Holder entered into a sale agreement with the Judgment Debtor on 21.06.2004 for Ac.2-22 gts of dry land in Sy.No.405 (Old)/405/12 (New), Paloncha Revenue Village, but the JDR failed to execute the registered sale deed despite receiving the balance sale consideration. The DHR filed O.S.No.13 of 2005 before the Principal District Court, Khammam, for specific performance, and on 31.08.2010, the Court decreed in favor of the DHR, directing the JDR to execute the sale deed, failing which it could be executed through Court process. Since the Judgment Debtor did not comply, the Decree Holder initiated E.P.No.12 of 2015 for execution, and during the proceedings, the 2 SKS,J C.R.P.No.377 of 2022 Court directed the Tahsildar, Paloncha, to register the sale deed. However, the Tahsildar objected, claiming the land was Government-assigned and its transfer violated the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977. The DHR countered, stating the land was assigned to Narayanapeta Eswaramma under the political sufferers quota per G.O.Ms.No.1743 on 02.08.1959, which permitted unrestricted sale, and that the 1974 sale deed was legally valid, with subsequent purchasers receiving pattadar passbooks and title deeds. Citing the ruling of this Court in A.Venkatesan & Others v. Government of A.P. 1, the trial court held that the Tahsildar had no authority to reject the registration, as the Government had not reclaimed the land, and directed him to register the sale deed in favor of the DHR. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - L N Reddy - Full Document
1