Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.28 seconds)
The Deputy General Manager Hr, Ntpc ... vs Marelly Raji Reddy, on 17 December, 2021 cites

K.Manjusree Etc vs State Of A.P & Anr on 15 February, 2008

"Since the selection process, for appointment to the posts of Junior Mazdoors in NTPC, is governed by Rules prescribed in this regard by the 4th respondent itself, the selection process initiated by them, for appointment of land oustees as Junior Mazdoors, cannot be faulted on the basis of the Office Memorandum dated 14.12.2015. Even otherwise, as held by the Supreme Court, in K.Manjusree v. State of Andhra Pradesh ((2008) 3 SCC 512), the selection process cannot be changed midstream, and the amended Rules cannot be applied to employment notifications issued prior to the date on which the amended rules came into force. Viewed from any angle, the selection process could not have been interdicted on the basis of the Government of India O.M. dated 14.12.2015. On this short 12 ground, the order under appeal is liable to be, and is accordingly, set aside."
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 638 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs R. Dayal & Ors on 17 February, 1997

1983 SCC (L&S) 382 : AIR 1983 SC 852] . The Court, appreciating the factual scenario and the rule position, came to hold as follows: (R. Dayal case [State of Rajasthan v. R. Dayal, (1997) 10 SCC 419 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 1631] , SCC p. 422, para 8) "8. ... But the question is whether selection would be made, in the case of appointment to the vacancies which admittedly arose after the amendment of the Rules came into force, according to the amended Rules or in terms of Rule 9 read with Rules 23 and 24-A, as mentioned hereinbefore. This Court has considered the similar question in para 9 of the judgment above-cited. This Court has specifically laid that the vacancies which occurred prior to the amendment of the Rules would be governed by the original Rules and not by the amended Rules. Accordingly, this Court had held that the posts which fell vacant prior to the amendment of the Rules would be governed by the original Rules and not the amended Rules. As a necessary corollary, the vacancies that arose subsequent to the amendment of the Rules are required to be filled in in accordance with the law existing as on the date when the vacancies arose."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 121 - Full Document
1   2 Next