Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.16 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 326 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Antar Singh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 September, 1978
It has been settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court that presumption of
innocence of the accused persons are further reinforced by their acquittal by
the Trial Court and the view of the Trial Judge as to the credibility of the
witnesses must be given proper weight and consideration, there must be
compelling and substantial reason for the Higher Court to come to a
conclusion different from that of a Trial Judge. Further In Antar Singh Vs.
State of Madhya Pradesh; AIR 1979 SC 1188 it has been held that where two
views of the evidence are reasonably possible, and the Trial Court has opted for
one favouring acquittal, the High Court should not disturb the same merely on
the ground that, if it were in the position of the Trial Court, it would have
taken the alternative view and convicted the accused accordingly.
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1