Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)The Oriental Insurance Company ... vs Karur Vysya Bank Limited Karur on 12 April, 2001
(ii) An excerpt from the decision of this Court in Oriental Insurance Co.,
Ltd., v. Karur Vysya Banka Ltd., reported in 2001(2) CTC 400 would run thus:
Section 30 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
S.R Bhanrale vs Union Of India And Others on 19 July, 1996
(i) An excerpt from the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in S.R.Bhanrale
v. Union of India reported in (1996) 10 Supreme Court Cases 172 would run thus:
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
Section 4A in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
District Collector vs John Nadar on 23 November, 2006
10. As such, it is clear that once the limitation point has not been
raised in the grounds of appeal and consequently there has been no framing of
substantial question of law on that point, the learned counsel for the
appellants cannot orally raise such a plea at the time of arguments. This Court
in District Collector, Chidambaranar District v. John Nadar reported in AIR 2007
Madras 228 held that when a citizen approaches the Government for relief, the
latter should not plead limitation.
1