Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.31 seconds)
Hamdard National Foundation (India) & ... vs Sadar Laboratories Pvt Ltd on 21 December, 2022 cites

Vardhman Buildtech Pvt Ltd & Ors vs Vardhman Properties Ltd on 17 August, 2016

39. The learned Single Judge had also referred to the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Vardhman Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Vardhman Properties Ltd.3 and in Schering Corporation v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd.2 and observed that the plaintiff / appellant could claim exclusivity only in respect of the complete trademark and not to either of the two words constituting the wordmark 'ROOH AFZA'.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 13 - B D Ahmed - Full Document

Schering Corporation & Ors. vs Alkem Laboratories Ltd. on 1 December, 2009

39. The learned Single Judge had also referred to the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Vardhman Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Vardhman Properties Ltd.3 and in Schering Corporation v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd.2 and observed that the plaintiff / appellant could claim exclusivity only in respect of the complete trademark and not to either of the two words constituting the wordmark 'ROOH AFZA'.
Delhi High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 34 - V Sanghi - Full Document

Hamdard National Foundation (India) & ... vs Sadar Laboratories Pvt. Limited on 6 January, 2022

1. Hamdard National Foundation (India) and Hamdard Dawakhana, also trading as Hamdard Laboratories (India) - Food Division, have filed the present appeal impugning an order dated Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:Dushyant Rawal FAO(OS) (COMM) 67/2022 Page 1 of 31 Signing Date:21.12.2022 2022/DHC/005711 06.01.2022 (hereafter 'the impugned order') passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the appellants' application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (being I.A. 12032/2020 in CS (COMM) 551/2020 captioned Hamdard National Foundation (India) & Anr. v. Sadar Laboratories Pvt. Limited), seeking an interim injunction against the respondent, Sadar Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter 'the respondent'), from infringing the appellants' registered trademarks, was rejected.
Delhi High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 2 - A Menon - Full Document

Cadila Laboratories Ltd. And Anr. vs Dabur India Limited on 31 March, 1997

22. The learned Single Judge, after evaluating the material placed on record, concluded that, prima facie, the appellants' claim of having built huge reputation and goodwill in respect of the trademark 'ROOH AFZA', cannot be rejected. The learned Single Judge, following the earlier decisions in Cadila Laboratories Ltd. & Anr. v. Dabur India Ltd.1, Schering Corporation & Ors. v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd.2 and Vardhman Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Vardhman Properties Ltd.3, held that the appellants can claim exclusivity only in respect of the complete trademark 'ROOH AFZA' and not the two words - 'ROOH' and 'AFZA' - that constitute the trademark.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 25 - Full Document
1