Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 106 (3.21 seconds)Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 41 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 91 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
101. Besides that, the proceeding may be quashed where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the Code or the concerned Act under which a criminal proceeding is instituted to the institution and continuance of the proceeding and where the allegations in the FIR do not constitute a cognizable offence but constituting only non cognizable offence, no nvestigation is permitted by a police officer without order of a Magistrate under Section 155(2) of the Code. The principles of law as laid down by the Supreme Court in this decision is well-settled and in the subsequent decisions the same view has been reiterated by the Supreme Court.
Section 417 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
M. S. Sheriff vs The State Of Madras And Others on 18 March, 1954
So far as it relates to relevancy of judgment under Sections 41 and 42 of the Evidence Act Mr. Shanti Bhusan cited the decisions in Manjanali Debi v. Ramdas Shome, reported in 4 CWN 176: 1978 Cr.LJ 1434; State of Maharashtra v. Yeshwantrao Dattatraya Rananavare and Ors., ; Oxford University Press v. Commissioner of Income Tax 2001(3) SCC 33; KG. Premshanker (supra), and , M.S. Sheriff and Anr. v. State of Madras and Ors.