Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.23 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 306 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 308 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Suresh Chandra Bahri vs State Of Bihar on 13 July, 1994
8 (a) The Honourable Apex Court in decision in Suresh Chandra Bahri v. State of Bihar [1995 Supp (1) SCC 80] has observed as follows:
Shammi Firoz vs The National Investigation Agency on 14 October, 2010
This Court may also add that the observations of Kerala High Court in Shammi Firoz v. The National Investigation Agency [2011 Crl. L.J.1529](extracted supra) succinctly expresses the prevalent view.
Noor Taki Alias Mammu vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 February, 1986
(c) The Full Bench of the Rajasthan High Court in the decision in Noor Taki alias Mammu v. State of Rajasthan [ 1986 Cri. L.J.1488] has observed as follows:
Rajesh Kumar vs State Of H.P on 3 October, 2008
Again as informed in the judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Rajesh Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh [2007 Cri. L.J. 2687], in circumstance where the petitioner himself has sought his release, it can be presumed that he does not have any fear or apprehension of threat of danger to his life at the hands of the accused. This only can be even more so in a case where the approver has been treated hostile by the prosecution.
Section 307 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Prem Chand And Another vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 26 August, 1993
9. This Court finds itself in full agreement with the observation of the Full Bench of the Delhi High Court in Prem Chand v. State [1985 Cri. L.J.1534](extracted supra).