Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.34 seconds)

Sarguja Transport Service vs State Transport Appellate Tribunal, ... on 12 November, 1986

Counsel for the opposite party no.5 has also placed reliance upon Section 29 of the Act and has contended that transferee will have no right to interfere in the conduct of the business, or to require accounts, or to inspect the books of the firm, but entitles the transferee only to receive the share of profits of the transferring partner, and the transferee shall accept the account of profits agreed to by the parties.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 523 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Jasbhai Motibhai Desai vs Roshan Kumar, Haji Bashir Ahmed & Ors on 19 December, 1975

" This Court has laid down in a number of decisions that in order to have the locus standi to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, an applicant should ordinarily be one who has a personal or individual right in the subject matter of the application, though in the case of some of the writs like habeas corpus or quo warranto this rule is relaxed or modified. In other words, as a general rule, infringement of some legal right or prejudice to some legal interest in hearing the petitioner is necessary to give him a locus standi in the matter.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 678 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document

The Calcutta Gas Company (Proprietary) ... vs The State Of West Bengal And Others on 5 February, 1962

(see The State of orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta, AIR 1952 SC 12; Calcutta Gas Co. v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1962 SC 1044; Ram Umeshwari Suthoo v. Member, Board of Revenue, Orissa, (1967) 1 SCA 413; Gadde Venkateswara Rao v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 828; State of Orissa v. Rajasaheb Chandanmall, (1973) 3 SCC 739; Dr. Satyanarayana Sinha v. M/s. S. Lal & Co., (1973) 2 SCC 696.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 673 - Full Document

Godde Venkateswara Rao vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 11 October, 1965

(see The State of orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta, AIR 1952 SC 12; Calcutta Gas Co. v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1962 SC 1044; Ram Umeshwari Suthoo v. Member, Board of Revenue, Orissa, (1967) 1 SCA 413; Gadde Venkateswara Rao v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 828; State of Orissa v. Rajasaheb Chandanmall, (1973) 3 SCC 739; Dr. Satyanarayana Sinha v. M/s. S. Lal & Co., (1973) 2 SCC 696.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 537 - Full Document

State Of Orissa And Ors. vs Rajasaheb Chandanmull Indrakumar (P) ... on 28 March, 1972

(see The State of orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta, AIR 1952 SC 12; Calcutta Gas Co. v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1962 SC 1044; Ram Umeshwari Suthoo v. Member, Board of Revenue, Orissa, (1967) 1 SCA 413; Gadde Venkateswara Rao v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 828; State of Orissa v. Rajasaheb Chandanmall, (1973) 3 SCC 739; Dr. Satyanarayana Sinha v. M/s. S. Lal & Co., (1973) 2 SCC 696.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 42 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next