Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (1.46 seconds)Section 320 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012
The Court in Gian Singh case was categorical
that in respect of serious offences or other
offences of mental depravity or offence of
merely dacoity under special statute, like
the Prevention of Corruption Act or the
offences committed by Public Servant while
working in that capacity. The mere settlement
between the parties would not be a ground to
quash the proceedings by the High Court and
inasmuch as settlement of such heinous crime
cannot have imprimatur of the Court."
Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
J.Ramesh Kamath & Ors vs Mohana Kurup & Ors on 4 May, 2016
3. Today, they have filed a joint memo stating
that respondent No.2 and the petitioners have
compromised the case out of Court and they have got
the order of divorce in M.C. No.6898/2018 before the
Principal Family Court, Bengaluru and the same has
been accepted on 06.02.2018. She has further
submitted that they are living separately and there is no
relationship between the petitioners and the respondent
and she/respondent No.2 has also filed affidavit along
with the petition with a separate memo. The said joint
memo has been signed by petitioners/accused Nos.1 to
3 and they have also filed a memo along with the
certified copy of the order passed in M.C.
No.6898/2018. At this juncture, it is worth to mention
here itself a decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
-4-
case of J.Ramesh Kamath and Others Vs. Mohana
Kurupt and Others, reported in (2016) 12 SCC 179,
wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down certain
principles as to under what circumstances the Court
can quash the proceedings or compound the offences
even in respect of a non-compoundable offences,
wherein it has been held as under:-