Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.22 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 50 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 61 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 436 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Dataram Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 February, 2018
Reliance can be placed upon the judgment of the Apex Court
rendered in "Dataram versus State of Uttar Pradesh and another", 2018(2)
R.C.R. (Criminal) 131, wherein it has been held that the grant of bail is a
general rule and putting persons in jail or in prison or in correction home is
an exception. Relevant paras of the said judgment is reproduced as under:-
Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs Union Of India on 23 November, 2017
6. The historical background of the provision for bail has
been elaborately and lucidly explained in a recent decision
delivered in Nikesh Tara chand Shah v. Union of India,
2017 (13) SCALE 609 going back to the days of the Magna
Carta.
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980
In that decision, reference was made to Gurbaksh
Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 565 in which
it is observed that it was held way back in Nagendra v.
King-Emperor, AIR 1924 Calcutta 476 that bail is not to
be withheld as a punishment.
Nagendra Nath Chakrabarthi vs King-Emperor on 1 October, 1923
In that decision, reference was made to Gurbaksh
Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 565 in which
it is observed that it was held way back in Nagendra v.
King-Emperor, AIR 1924 Calcutta 476 that bail is not to
be withheld as a punishment.