Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.53 seconds)

State Of Bihar vs Ramdaras Ahir And Ors. on 6 August, 1984

Since the issue in Ramdaras Ahir's case had arisen only in the context of a capital charge and the reversal of an acquittal thereon, the examination and the adjudication of the question was confined to a case of that nature. From that it does not follow that - some part of its rationale or the ratio itself would not be equally attracted in cases other than those on a capital charge or ones not directly involving the reversal of an acquittal. However, these are issues which can only be justifiably examined when they properly arise in a case and cannot be pronounced upon in an academic vacuum.
Patna High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 32 - Full Document

Hussainara Khatoon & Ors vs Home Secretary, State Of Bihar, Govt. Of ... on 12 February, 1979

13. In India, there appears to be an acute and, indeed total paucity of precedents on the point of legal consequences that must flow in the wake of violation of the constitutional guarantee of speedy and public trial. The question was pointedly raised in Hussainara, . Khatoon's case , but was not answered in terms. However, the possibility of the accused being entitled to be released unconditionally from the charge levelled against him was distinctly visualised and seems to have been implicitly recognised. However, the issue has been the subject matter of consideration in the American Courts, and as would be shown later, these precedents on the Sixth Amendment would be applicable and attracted to the situation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 992 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 Next