Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 74 (0.67 seconds)The Electricity Act, 2003
Article 11 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 14 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Article 1 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Radhakrishna Agarwal & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 17 March, 1977
It has been submitted that the present
case is purely contractual in nature and therefore, applying the ratio of
the case of "M/s. Radha Krishna Agrawal" (supra), the writ petition is
not maintainable.
The Companies Act, 1956
State Of Bihar And Others vs Jain Plastics And Chemicals Limited on 21 November, 2001
Whether or not
the High Court should exercise jurisdiction under
Article 226 of the Constitution would largely depend
upon the nature of dispute and if the dispute cannot be
resolved without going into the factual controversy, the
High Court should not entertain the writ petition. As
noted above, the writ petition was primarily founded on
allegation of breach of contract. Question whether the
action of the opposite party in the writ petition
amounted to breach of contractual obligation ultimately
depends on facts and would require material evidence
to be scrutinised and in such a case writ jurisdiction
should not be exercised. (See State of Bihar v. Jain
Plastics & Chemicals Ltd.)
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Orissa Agro Industries Corporation ... vs Bharati Industries And Ors on 8 November, 2005
In the case of "Orissa Agro Industries Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Bharati
Industries" reported in (2005) 12 SCC 725, by following the judgment
in the case of " Radhakrishna Agarwal" (supra), it was held as
follows: