Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 49 (0.37 seconds)

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013

It is submitted that the very genesis of the registration of Crime No. 469 of 2024 is not legal and valid in the eyes of the law. It is also submitted that without Crime No. 90 of 2024 being decided on merits after a full-fledged trial, an allegation regarding the registration of a false crime and the subsequent registration of a fresh crime against the police officers and the legal advisor must be set aside. It is further submitted that the continuation of an investigation in a case that has no foundation should be addressed by this Court. It is also submitted that while registering Crime No. 469 of 2024, the police officer did not conduct any preliminary investigation before registering case. The Commissioner of Police the enquiry report submitted by the Assistant cannot be considered as the preliminary investigation, which is essentially required to be conducted by the investigating officer. The learned Senior Counsel appearing in CrI.P. No. 3933 of 2025 submits that the registration of Crime No. 469 of 2024 is in direct violation of the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Lalitha Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others.
Supreme Court of India Cites 71 - Cited by 18813 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next