Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The National Security Act, 1980
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 341 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Bachan Singh, Sher Singh And Anr. And ... vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 16 August, 1982
An order for
preventive detention is made on the subjective satisfaction
of the detaining authority. The detaining authority before
exercising the power of preventive detention would take into
consideration the past conduct or antecedent history of the
person and as a matter of fact it is largely from the prior
events showing the tendencies or inclinations of a man that
an inference could be drawn whether he is likely even in the
future to act in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of
public order. If the subjective satisfaction of the
detaining authority leads to this conclusion it can put an
end to the activity by making, a preventive detention order.
(see Ujagar Singh v. State of Punjab, and Jagir Singh v.
State of Punjab).(1) Now, if the man is already detained can
a detaining authority be said to have been subjectively
satisfied that a preventive detention order be made ?
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Jagir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 21 March, 1967
An order for
preventive detention is made on the subjective satisfaction
of the detaining authority. The detaining authority before
exercising the power of preventive detention would take into
consideration the past conduct or antecedent history of the
person and as a matter of fact it is largely from the prior
events showing the tendencies or inclinations of a man that
an inference could be drawn whether he is likely even in the
future to act in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of
public order. If the subjective satisfaction of the
detaining authority leads to this conclusion it can put an
end to the activity by making, a preventive detention order.
(see Ujagar Singh v. State of Punjab, and Jagir Singh v.
State of Punjab).(1) Now, if the man is already detained can
a detaining authority be said to have been subjectively
satisfied that a preventive detention order be made ?