Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.27 seconds)

State Of Karnataka vs M. Devendrappa & Anr on 16 January, 2002

16. From the aforesaid decision, it is clear that the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. though wide, has to be exercised sparingly, carefully and with caution and only when such exercise is justified by the tests specifically laid down in the section itself. It is also clear that the Court has power to prevent abuse of process of law. It is also clear that when no offence is disclosed by the complaint, the Court may examine the question of fact. When a complaint is sought to be quashed, it is permissible to look into the materials to assess what the complainant has alleged and whether any offence is made out even if the allegations are accepted in toto.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 494 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next