Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.39 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Punjab & Ors vs M/S. Surinder Kumar & Co. & Ors on 11 December, 1996
Reported in MANU/SC/0406/1996 : [1996]1SCR972 ,S tate of Punjab v. Surinder
Kumar and Ors. Reported in MANU/SC/0306/1992 : [1992]194ITR434(SC), and B.N.
Nagarajan and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors. Reported in
MANU/SC/0450/1979 : (1979)IILL J209SC on the other, which has been brought
out in one of the judgments under appeal of Karnataka High Court in State of
Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466,
learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization
is repugnant to Articles 16(4), 309, 320 and 335 of the Constitution of India
and, therefore, these cases are required to be heard by a Bench of Five
learned Judges (Constitution Bench).
State Of Karnataka And Anr vs H. Ganesh Kamath Etc. Etc on 31 March, 1983
Reported in MANU/SC/0406/1996 : [1996]1SCR972 ,S tate of Punjab v. Surinder
Kumar and Ors. Reported in MANU/SC/0306/1992 : [1992]194ITR434(SC), and B.N.
Nagarajan and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors. Reported in
MANU/SC/0450/1979 : (1979)IILL J209SC on the other, which has been brought
out in one of the judgments under appeal of Karnataka High Court in State of
Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466,
learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization
is repugnant to Articles 16(4), 309, 320 and 335 of the Constitution of India
and, therefore, these cases are required to be heard by a Bench of Five
learned Judges (Constitution Bench).
State Of Punjab vs Jagdip Singh & Ors on 19 September, 1963
In this context,we have also to bear in mind the
exposition of law by a Constitution Bench in Stateof Punjab v. Jagdip Singh
and Ors. MANU/SC/0273/1963 : (1966)ILL J749SC . It was held therein,
"In our opinion, where a Government servant has no right to a pos tor to a
particular status, though an authority under the Government acting beyond its
competence had purported to give that person a status which it was not
entitled to give, he will not in law be deemed to have been validly appointed
to the post or given the particular status."
2Ec.To Govt.,School Education ... vs Thiru R.Govindaswamy & Ors on 21 February, 2014
7.The legal principles laid down by the Constitution Bench has been
retreated by the two Hon'ble Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in
the case of Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Chennai Vs.
R.Govindaswamy and others reported in (2014) 4 Supreme Court Cases 769, para
8 is extracted here under: