Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.44 seconds)P.K. Dalmia vs O.P. Sharma/M.K. Bagree on 9 October, 2017
Furthermore, he argued that the FAA had
erroneously relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Registrar
of Companies & others vs. Dharmendra Kumar Garg and Another decided on 01.06.2012 and the
decisions of the Commission in the case of Shri K. Lal vs. Shri M.K. Bagri dated 12.04.2007 and
in the matter of Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi vs. CBSE, New Delhi dated 11.12.2012,
as the same decisions were not applicable in his case.
Mr.Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Cbse on 30 January, 2013
Furthermore, he argued that the FAA had
erroneously relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Registrar
of Companies & others vs. Dharmendra Kumar Garg and Another decided on 01.06.2012 and the
decisions of the Commission in the case of Shri K. Lal vs. Shri M.K. Bagri dated 12.04.2007 and
in the matter of Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi vs. CBSE, New Delhi dated 11.12.2012,
as the same decisions were not applicable in his case.
Naresh Trehan vs Rakesh Kumar Gupta on 24 November, 2014
In the context of non disclosure of information under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act, 2005, the
decision in Naresh Trehan vs Rakesh Kumar Gupta (W.P(C) 85/2010) decided on 24.11.2014,
was referred to, wherein it was held as under:
Inst.Of Chartered Accountants Of India vs Shaunak H Sayta & Ors on 2 September, 2011
Furthermore, in this context of non disclosure of information under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI
Act, 2005, the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India Vs. Shaunak H. Satya and Ors) in Civil Appeal NO. 7571 of 2011- dated
02/09/2011 was referred to, wherein it was held that:
Registrar Of Companies & Ors vs Dharmendra Kumar Garg & Anr on 1 June, 2012
Furthermore, he argued that the FAA had
erroneously relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Registrar
of Companies & others vs. Dharmendra Kumar Garg and Another decided on 01.06.2012 and the
decisions of the Commission in the case of Shri K. Lal vs. Shri M.K. Bagri dated 12.04.2007 and
in the matter of Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal, Delhi vs. CBSE, New Delhi dated 11.12.2012,
as the same decisions were not applicable in his case.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
Section 8 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Cpio, Supreme Court Of India, Tilak ... vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal & Anr. on 2 September, 2009
Similarly, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of Secretary General, Supreme Court of
India v. Subhash Chandra Agrawal LPA No. 501/2009 dated 12.01.2010 had held as under
Mr. K. R. Ramesh vs Bank Of India on 15 February, 2012
During the hearing, a copy of the written submission was handed over by the Appellants'
representative to the Commission, wherein while re-iterating the facts of the case, reply/order of
the CPIO/FAA, it was submitted that the CPIO and the FAA had misconstrued the provisions of
Section 8 of the Act. It was further submitted that denial of access to information under the said
provision had to be substantiated with reasons as to why it was necessitated. He further relied
upon the judgments pronounced by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, in the case of Bhagat Singh
Page 2 of 5
vs. CIC and Ors. rendered in WP (C) No. 3114 of 2007 dated 03.12.2007, para 13 and the
Commission's decision in the matter of Mr. K. R. Ramesh vs. Bank of India in
Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/003607, in which the Commission had also referred to the
abovementioned para, and several other decisions had been referred by him to substantiate his
claims. Based on the above submissions and judgments, it was prayed to the Commission to
strike down the reply/order of the CPIO/FAA and provide him the desired information as sought
in the RTI application.
1