Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (2.02 seconds)Section 28 in Indian Companies Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 9 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 53 in The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 [Entire Act]
Section 53 in Indian Companies Act, 1913 [Entire Act]
Hansraj Gupta vs N.P. Asthana on 28 July, 1932
In none of these cases, was the question in issue before me examined and no question of limitation being affected by the doctrine of relation back arose in those cases. I cannot regard these decisions as authorities giving any clue to the solution of the problem arising in this case. He also cited an authority of the Privy Council reported in Hansraj Gupta v. N.P. Asthana, AIR 1932 P. C. 240 (T), which was a judgment from Allahabad High Court. Their Lordships referred to the following passage from the judgment under appeal before them:
Magandas Bhukandas vs Bhalchandra Ramrao on 4 December, 1953
In Magandas Bhukandas v. Bhalchandra Ramrao, AIR 1954 Bom. 436 (E), the words "the date of the order of adjudication" occurring in Section 78(2) of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, came up for interpretation with reference to Section 38(7). Gajendragadkar J. thought that it would be unreasonable to give effect to the legal fiction introduced by Section 28(7) in considering the question of exclusion of time under Section 78(2). It was observed: