Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)
The Principal, Sabari Ptb Smaraka H.S.S vs The Additional Registering Authority, ... on 7 July, 2021
cites
Avishek Goenka vs Union Of India & Anr on 27 April, 2012
Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 and the law laid down by the Apex
Court in Avishek Goenka v. Union of India [(2012) 5 SCC
321] and Avishek Goenka (2) v. Union of India [(2012) 8
SCC 441], tampering with the percentage of visual transmission of
light of the safety glass of the windscreen, rear window and side
windows of a motor vehicle, either by pasting any material upon
the safety glass or by fixing sliding 'cloth curtains', etc. are legally
impermissible.
Court On Its Own Motion vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 December, 2012
brutal gang rape of a young woman in Delhi, in a public transport
vehicle, in the late evening of 16.12.2012. Chapter 10 of the report
dated 23.01.2013 deals with provision of adequate safety measures
and amenities in respect of women. After referring to the law laid
down by the Delhi High Court in Court on its Own Motion v.
Union of India [(2007) 139 DLT 244] and also the law laid
down by the Apex Court in Avishek Goenka v. Union of India
[(2012) 5 SCC 321] prohibiting the use of black films of any
visual transmission of light percentage or any other material upon
the safety glasses, windscreens (front and rear) and side glasses of
all vehicles throughout the country, the Committee observed as
follows in Para.6 of the report;
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Section 3 in The Emblems And Names (Prevention Of Improper Use) Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Avishek Goenka vs Union Of India & Anr on 3 August, 2012
Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 and the law laid down by the Apex
Court in Avishek Goenka v. Union of India [(2012) 5 SCC
321] and Avishek Goenka (2) v. Union of India [(2012) 8
SCC 441], tampering with the percentage of visual transmission of
light of the safety glass of the windscreen, rear window and side
windows of a motor vehicle, either by pasting any material upon
the safety glass or by fixing sliding 'cloth curtains', etc. are legally
impermissible.
Jijith vs State Of Kerala on 12 July, 2017
In Jijith and others v. State of Kerala and others
[2019 (1) KHC 463 : 2018 SCC OnLine Ker 8262] this Court
held that, in view of the provisions under Rule 100 of the Central
WP(C) No.23021/2018 5 / 14
W.P.(C)No.23021 of 2018 :-4-:
Saji Thomas vs The Deputy Transport Commissioner on 23 January, 2009
In Saji v. Deputy Transport Commissioner
[2019 (3) KHC 836 : 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 2047] this Court
held that the law laid down in Jijith is equally applicable in the case
of transport vehicles owned/operated by KSRTC, KURTC and also
Government vehicles.
1