Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.40 seconds)
Esic Employee vs M/O Labour on 29 May, 2018 cites

Mallikarjuna Rao And Ors. Etc. Etc vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 10 April, 1990

In Mallikarjuna Rao v. State of A.P., (1990)2 SCC 707, the Hon‟ble Supreme Court has held that Courts cannot usurp the functions assigned to the executive under the Constitution and cannot even indirectly require the executive to exercise its rule making power in any manner. The Courts cannot assume to itself a supervisory role over the rule-making power of the executive under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 121 - K Singh - Full Document

Tech. Executive (Anti Pollution) ... vs Commissioner Of Transport Dept. & Anr on 10 March, 1997

16. It has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Technical Executive (Anti-Pollution) Welfare Association v. Commissioner of Transport Department and another, (1997)9 SCC 38, that it would be for the appropriate Government to take policy decision. The Tribunal is not competent to give any direction to the Government to lay down any policy. Such a direction would amount to encroaching upon area of policy-making which is exclusively within the purview of the Government.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

The Dean, Goa Medical College, ... vs Dr. Sudhir Kumar Solanki And Anr. on 3 September, 2001

In this context, the applicants have also relied upon the decision of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Dean, Goa Medical College vs. Dr. Sudhir Kumar Solanki, (2001)7 SCC 645) clarifying that „the dictionary meaning of the word „technical‟ is also „professional‟ and is used in contradiction with pure sciences to prepare professionals in applied sciences. Even in the RRs for Nursing Staff prepared by ICMR, the post of NO has been classified as "Group „C‟ Technical". Even otherwise, the post of NO/Stretcher Bearers is a Group „C‟ post and there cannot be any dispute on the point that the said post is a technical one, keeping in view its function of job content, degree of hardship, regular involvement, skill required as well as academic qualifications and experience. It is also evident from the duty rosters and circulars being issued by various ESIC hospital that the NOs are being assigned the duties in substitute to the technical post and perusal of the said circulars assigning jobs to the NOs leave no doubt that the post of NO is nothing but a Technical one.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1