Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.49 seconds)

M/S. Rotork Controla India (P) Ltd vs Commnr. Of Income Tax, Chennai on 12 May, 2009

2. As regards Question Nos. (a), (b) and (d) Mr. Suresh Kumar states that they are already covered. Question Nos. (a) and (b) are covered by the recent order of this court passed on 28 th June 2023 in Income Tax Appeal No. 414 of 2018. Question No. (d) is covered by judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Rotork Controls India (P). Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai1. That would leave Question No. (c). Mr. Suresh Kumar submitted that the tribunal remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer (A.O.) to allow the risk adjustment margin and recompute the comparable raises a substantial question of law because Rule 10B(e)(iii) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (the Rules) do not provide for any adjustment for risk difference.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 431 - S H Kapadia - Full Document

Sap Labs India Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer Circle 6 (1) (1) ... on 19 April, 2023

Relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in SAP Labs India Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer, Circle 6, Bangalore 2, Mr. Suresh Kumar submitted that any determination of the arm's length price under Chapter X de hors the relevant provisions of the guidelines can be considered as perverse and may be considered as a substantial question of law as perversity itself can be said to be a substantial question of law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 4 - M R Shah - Full Document
1