Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.49 seconds)Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 366 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Ravinder Singh Gorkhi vs State Of U.P on 12 May, 2006
"18. Therefore, a document may be admissible,
rt
but as to whether the entry contained therein
has any probative value may still be required to
be examined in the facts and circumstances of a
particular case. The aforesaid legal proposition
stands fortified by the judgments of this Court in
Ram Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Bihar AIR 1970
SC 326; Ram Murti Vs. State of Haryana AIR 1970
SC 1029; Dayaram & Ors. Vs. Dawalatshah & Anr.
AIR 1971 SC 681; Harpal Singh & Anr. Vs. State of
Himachal Pradesh AIR 1981 SC 361; Ravinder
Singh Gorkhi Vs. State of U.P. (2006) 5 SCC 584;
Section 342 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Harpal Singh And Anr. vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 November, 1980
"18. Therefore, a document may be admissible,
rt
but as to whether the entry contained therein
has any probative value may still be required to
be examined in the facts and circumstances of a
particular case. The aforesaid legal proposition
stands fortified by the judgments of this Court in
Ram Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Bihar AIR 1970
SC 326; Ram Murti Vs. State of Haryana AIR 1970
SC 1029; Dayaram & Ors. Vs. Dawalatshah & Anr.
AIR 1971 SC 681; Harpal Singh & Anr. Vs. State of
Himachal Pradesh AIR 1981 SC 361; Ravinder
Singh Gorkhi Vs. State of U.P. (2006) 5 SCC 584;
Babloo Pasi vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 3 October, 2008
Babloo Pasi Vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. (2008)
13 SCC 133; Desh Raj Vs. Bodh Raj AIR 2008 SC
632; and Ram Suresh Singh Vs. Prabhat Singh
@Chhotu Singh & Anr. (2009) 6 SCC 681. In these
cases, it has been held that even if the entry was
made in an official record by the concerned
official in the discharge of his official duty, it may
have weight but still may require corroboration
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:29:02 :::HCHP
19
by the person on whose information the entry has
been made and as to whether the entry so
.
Desh Raj vs Bodh Raj on 30 November, 2007
Babloo Pasi Vs. State of Jharkhand & Anr. (2008)
13 SCC 133; Desh Raj Vs. Bodh Raj AIR 2008 SC
632; and Ram Suresh Singh Vs. Prabhat Singh
@Chhotu Singh & Anr. (2009) 6 SCC 681. In these
cases, it has been held that even if the entry was
made in an official record by the concerned
official in the discharge of his official duty, it may
have weight but still may require corroboration
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:29:02 :::HCHP
19
by the person on whose information the entry has
been made and as to whether the entry so
.