M. Gopalakrishnan vs State By Addl. S.P. Cbi, Bs&Fc Bangalore on 11 February, 2009
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner place reliance
or three mul
ne
tial, mot before trial, the « question of sanct tion , would
aree only if the werk under vaken is dotie" by the
acces m His * duty, fhe. exocesie the
power, an abuse' « oe ganction is not
reg uire, Nhe Ag Court ig theo case of 'CHOUDHURY
PARVEEN SU JLTANA ve STATE OF WEST BENGAL &
ANE.' (2009 AIR SC SCW 8 61}. wae consuiering the subject
of aanetion 6 prosecute, "held that it is neceseary if it is
: done in tise discharge of duty as an official duty and do
not inclade + the abuse of power. Similar is the ratis
ecumgel am the case of
relied. By the
we, M. 'GOPALAKRISHNAN v. STATE BY ADDL. S.P.CcBI,
: B. S.-8 F.C., BANGALORE? reported in 20090 AIR
of the Apex Ceur, co contend thet: the
subject is @ question which has: to be gone. intto in the
eo
aden
a
ange
fat
Peed
Ee
ey
Bodd
apes
4D
4
ma
Xue
nk
flag
vs
a
Meine?