Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.26 seconds)Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
The State Of Uttar Pradesh Home ... vs Wasif Haider on 10 December, 2018
32. As such, from the entire discussion made above, it is
clear that the investigation so conducted by the IO in the present mat-
ter is in most callous manner and the IO for the reasons best known to
him has either not placed on record the best evidence so available
with him i.e. phone recording nor has proved the evidence which is
already placed on record i.e. the alleged messages. With regard to
faulty investigation, Hon'ble Apex Court in State of U.P. v. Wasif
Haider, (2019) 2 SCC 303
Surender @ Dheeraj vs State on 27 February, 2018
Hon'ble High Court in Delhi in Surender @ Dheeraj v. State 2018
SCC OnLine Del 7506, it was observed by Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi :
Kehar Singh & Ors vs State (Delhi Admn.) on 3 August, 1988
In Kehar Singh v. State
(1988) 3 SCC 609 : AIR 1988 SC 1883 one of the
accused, Balbir Singh, was arrested at the bus
stand at Najafgarh, which was a public place but
there were no independent public witnesses to
the arrest. It was argued by the State that there
was no such requirement in the Cr PC. Repelling
this contention, the Supreme Court observed:
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
1