Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)
Uttamrao Ramraoji Deshmukh And 2 Ors vs Education Officer (Second) Zilla ... on 4 November, 2023 cites

Hindustan Steel Works Construction ... vs Hindustan Steel Works Construction ... on 10 February, 1995

In this regard, the learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance on the decisions in M/s. Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Employees of M/s. Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd. and others [(1979) 2 SCC 80], Chandrakant Shikshan Sanstha vs. Rajendra s/o Ramaji Belekar and others [2010 (1) Mh.L.J. 391], Deepali Gundu Surwase vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (B.Ed) and others [(2013) 10 SCC 324] and Gowramma C.(Dead) by Legal Representatives Vs. Manager(Personnel), Hindustan Aeronautical Limited and another [(2022) 11 SCC 794]. It was thus prayed that the petitioners be held entitled to the reliefs prayed for.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 337 - B P Reddy - Full Document

N.T. Deshmukh And Ors. vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 2 February, 2006

2. The petitioners in Writ Petition No. 5010 of 2007 are members of the non-teaching staff of the Secondary School that was being conducted by the fourth respondent-Education Society, Belora, a public Trust registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. The petitioners in Writ Petition Nos.4857 of 2007 and 5011 of 2007 were members of the teaching staff of the said School run by the public Trust. It is the case of the petitioners that despite discharging satisfactory services, the Deputy Director of Education, Amravati on 18.05.1996 was pleased to de-recognise the school in question. In the said order it was stated that since the results of the school were not satisfactory and it was noticed that various facilities in the said school were not being provided in a satisfactory manner, in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause 7.4 of the Secondary School Code the recognition of the school was being withdrawn from the Academic Session 1995-96. The petitioners being aggrieved by the aforesaid WP-5010-07 c WP-4857-07 c WP-5011-07(J).odt 5/17 order passed by the Deputy Director of Education approached this Court in Writ Petition No. 1372 of 1996 (N.T.Deshmukh and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others). By the judgment dated 02.02.2006 this Court held that prior to holding the employees of the school responsible for the passing of the order of de- recognition, it was necessary for the Education Officer(Secondary) to have given an opportunity of hearing to them. Since the order of de-recognition was passed in breach of principles of natural justice, the said order dated 18.05.1996 was set aside. The Education Officer (Secondary) was directed to take a fresh decision in the matter after giving due opportunity to the petitioners. It was further directed that if it was found that the employees were not responsible for de-recognition of the school, their respective cases for grant of pensionary benefits be examined.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - J N Patel - Full Document
1