Chaudhri Mehdi Hasan vs Muhammad Hasan on 21 March, 1906
4. The gift under Exhibit A being thus invalid under Muhammadan Law for want of delivery of possession see Vahazullah Sahib v. Boyapati Nagayya 17 M.L.J. 562 : 30 M. 519, and Chaudhri Mehdi Hasan v. Muhammad Hasan 20 C.W.N. 706 : 28 A. 439 : 3 A.L.J. 405 : 8 Bom. L.R. 387 : 4 C.L.J. 295 : 33 I.A. 68 (P.C.) : 9 O.C. 106 : 1 M.L.T. 106, we reverse the judgment of the lower Court and give the plaintiff a decree declaring his title as prayed for in the plaint. The parties will bear their respective costs in both Courts, as it was the plaintiff's own fault in executing the deed, Exhibit A, which led to the 1st defendant's creditor's attempts to proceed against the properties covered by the deed.