Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)Shri Krishan vs The Kurukshetra University, ... on 17 November, 1975
5. Learned counsel for petitioners states that petitioners are
Diploma Holders in Electrical Engineering/Electronics
Engineering and have studied subjects of electric/
SWP no.888/2015 Page 2 of 12
3
electronics, while pursuing their Diploma course, which are
taught to persons having ITI in electric or electronics and
in terms of condition no.12 of Advertisement Notice No.04
of 2013 dated 23rd February 2013, Matric with ITI is
minimum qualification for the post of Technician-III, thus,
petitioners have higher and better qualification. They even
sat in written test and declared successful. Thereafter
petitioners appeared in interview. But they do not figure in
select list. According to learned counsel, respondent
Board's contention - petitioners do not possess Matric with
ITI in relevant trade, the minimum qualification prescribed
for post of Technician-III, are ineligible for the post - is
without any substance. Learned counsel also invites
attention of this Court to Syllabus of Semester System for
the Trade of Electrician under Craftsmen Training Scheme
(CTS) Two Years/Four Years as also Curriculum/
Information Brochure for Three Years' Diploma Programme
in Electrical Engineering of Government Polytechnic
College Ganderbal (Annexure D-1 & D-2 to writ petition).
To buttress his arguments that he advanced, learned
counsel has cited decisions rendered in Shri Krishan v.
The Kurukshetra University AIR 1976 SC 376; Life
Insurance Corporation of India and others v. Triveni
SWP no.888/2015 Page 3 of 12
4
Sharan Misra (2014) 10 SCC 346; S. Gurmeet Singh
& anr v. State & ors 2008 (II) SLJ 875; judgement
dated 20th May 2010 in SWP no.2670 of 2001 titled Ajay
Kumar Uttam v. State of J&K and others; judgement
dated 31st March 2016 passed by the Division Bench of
this Court in LPA no.28/2016 titled Mohammad Maqbool
Rather & anr v. Hamid Rauf Ganai & anr.
Life Insurance Corp. Of India & Ors vs Triveni Sharan Mishra on 2 September, 2014
5. Learned counsel for petitioners states that petitioners are
Diploma Holders in Electrical Engineering/Electronics
Engineering and have studied subjects of electric/
SWP no.888/2015 Page 2 of 12
3
electronics, while pursuing their Diploma course, which are
taught to persons having ITI in electric or electronics and
in terms of condition no.12 of Advertisement Notice No.04
of 2013 dated 23rd February 2013, Matric with ITI is
minimum qualification for the post of Technician-III, thus,
petitioners have higher and better qualification. They even
sat in written test and declared successful. Thereafter
petitioners appeared in interview. But they do not figure in
select list. According to learned counsel, respondent
Board's contention - petitioners do not possess Matric with
ITI in relevant trade, the minimum qualification prescribed
for post of Technician-III, are ineligible for the post - is
without any substance. Learned counsel also invites
attention of this Court to Syllabus of Semester System for
the Trade of Electrician under Craftsmen Training Scheme
(CTS) Two Years/Four Years as also Curriculum/
Information Brochure for Three Years' Diploma Programme
in Electrical Engineering of Government Polytechnic
College Ganderbal (Annexure D-1 & D-2 to writ petition).
To buttress his arguments that he advanced, learned
counsel has cited decisions rendered in Shri Krishan v.
The Kurukshetra University AIR 1976 SC 376; Life
Insurance Corporation of India and others v. Triveni
SWP no.888/2015 Page 3 of 12
4
Sharan Misra (2014) 10 SCC 346; S. Gurmeet Singh
& anr v. State & ors 2008 (II) SLJ 875; judgement
dated 20th May 2010 in SWP no.2670 of 2001 titled Ajay
Kumar Uttam v. State of J&K and others; judgement
dated 31st March 2016 passed by the Division Bench of
this Court in LPA no.28/2016 titled Mohammad Maqbool
Rather & anr v. Hamid Rauf Ganai & anr.
S. Gurmeet Singh And Ors. vs State And Ors. on 13 December, 2007
5. Learned counsel for petitioners states that petitioners are
Diploma Holders in Electrical Engineering/Electronics
Engineering and have studied subjects of electric/
SWP no.888/2015 Page 2 of 12
3
electronics, while pursuing their Diploma course, which are
taught to persons having ITI in electric or electronics and
in terms of condition no.12 of Advertisement Notice No.04
of 2013 dated 23rd February 2013, Matric with ITI is
minimum qualification for the post of Technician-III, thus,
petitioners have higher and better qualification. They even
sat in written test and declared successful. Thereafter
petitioners appeared in interview. But they do not figure in
select list. According to learned counsel, respondent
Board's contention - petitioners do not possess Matric with
ITI in relevant trade, the minimum qualification prescribed
for post of Technician-III, are ineligible for the post - is
without any substance. Learned counsel also invites
attention of this Court to Syllabus of Semester System for
the Trade of Electrician under Craftsmen Training Scheme
(CTS) Two Years/Four Years as also Curriculum/
Information Brochure for Three Years' Diploma Programme
in Electrical Engineering of Government Polytechnic
College Ganderbal (Annexure D-1 & D-2 to writ petition).
To buttress his arguments that he advanced, learned
counsel has cited decisions rendered in Shri Krishan v.
The Kurukshetra University AIR 1976 SC 376; Life
Insurance Corporation of India and others v. Triveni
SWP no.888/2015 Page 3 of 12
4
Sharan Misra (2014) 10 SCC 346; S. Gurmeet Singh
& anr v. State & ors 2008 (II) SLJ 875; judgement
dated 20th May 2010 in SWP no.2670 of 2001 titled Ajay
Kumar Uttam v. State of J&K and others; judgement
dated 31st March 2016 passed by the Division Bench of
this Court in LPA no.28/2016 titled Mohammad Maqbool
Rather & anr v. Hamid Rauf Ganai & anr.
Mohammad Maqbool Rather & Anr vs Hamid Rauf Ganai & Anr on 31 March, 2016
5. Learned counsel for petitioners states that petitioners are
Diploma Holders in Electrical Engineering/Electronics
Engineering and have studied subjects of electric/
SWP no.888/2015 Page 2 of 12
3
electronics, while pursuing their Diploma course, which are
taught to persons having ITI in electric or electronics and
in terms of condition no.12 of Advertisement Notice No.04
of 2013 dated 23rd February 2013, Matric with ITI is
minimum qualification for the post of Technician-III, thus,
petitioners have higher and better qualification. They even
sat in written test and declared successful. Thereafter
petitioners appeared in interview. But they do not figure in
select list. According to learned counsel, respondent
Board's contention - petitioners do not possess Matric with
ITI in relevant trade, the minimum qualification prescribed
for post of Technician-III, are ineligible for the post - is
without any substance. Learned counsel also invites
attention of this Court to Syllabus of Semester System for
the Trade of Electrician under Craftsmen Training Scheme
(CTS) Two Years/Four Years as also Curriculum/
Information Brochure for Three Years' Diploma Programme
in Electrical Engineering of Government Polytechnic
College Ganderbal (Annexure D-1 & D-2 to writ petition).
To buttress his arguments that he advanced, learned
counsel has cited decisions rendered in Shri Krishan v.
The Kurukshetra University AIR 1976 SC 376; Life
Insurance Corporation of India and others v. Triveni
SWP no.888/2015 Page 3 of 12
4
Sharan Misra (2014) 10 SCC 346; S. Gurmeet Singh
& anr v. State & ors 2008 (II) SLJ 875; judgement
dated 20th May 2010 in SWP no.2670 of 2001 titled Ajay
Kumar Uttam v. State of J&K and others; judgement
dated 31st March 2016 passed by the Division Bench of
this Court in LPA no.28/2016 titled Mohammad Maqbool
Rather & anr v. Hamid Rauf Ganai & anr.
Section 3 in Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Decentralization and Recruitment Act, 2010 [Entire Act]
1