Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (1.36 seconds)State Of Jharkhand & Ors vs Jitendra Kumar Srivastava & Anr on 14 August, 2013
45. The reliance placed by the learned counsel on the Judgments in
the State of Jharkhand (supra), Major GS Sodhi (supra), and D.S
Nakara & Ors. (supra) are all distinguishable on their own facts,
hence not applicable to the facts of the present case.
Major G.S. Sodhi vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 30 November, 1990
45. The reliance placed by the learned counsel on the Judgments in
the State of Jharkhand (supra), Major GS Sodhi (supra), and D.S
Nakara & Ors. (supra) are all distinguishable on their own facts,
hence not applicable to the facts of the present case.
D.S. Nakara & Others vs Union Of India on 17 December, 1982
45. The reliance placed by the learned counsel on the Judgments in
the State of Jharkhand (supra), Major GS Sodhi (supra), and D.S
Nakara & Ors. (supra) are all distinguishable on their own facts,
hence not applicable to the facts of the present case.
Union Of India & Ors vs Subrata Nath on 9 April, 2019
In this regard, it would
be apposite to refer to the relevant paragraphs in Subrata Nath
(supra), which read as under:-
Mahinder Dutt Sharma vs U.O.I & Ors on 11 April, 2014
44. We are afraid that the Judgment in Mahinder Dutt Sharma
(supra) does not support the case of the petitioner in any manner, as
the petitioner has been dismissed from the Service on an act of moral
turpitude/dishonesty and an act designed for personal gains from the
employer, being the Government. Given the nature of the offences, we
do not find this to be a fit case for the grant of Compassionate
Allowance.
1