Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.64 seconds)The Railways Act, 1989
Union Of India vs Rina Devi on 9 May, 2018
Union of India V. Radha Yadav, (2019) 3 SCC 410
6
Union of India V. Rina Devi, (2019) 3 SCC 572
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Union Of India vs Radha Yadav on 29 January, 2019
Union of India V. Radha Yadav, (2019) 3 SCC 410
6
Union of India V. Rina Devi, (2019) 3 SCC 572
United India Ins.Co.Ltd vs Sunil Kumar & Anr on 29 October, 2013
16.6. We are unable to uphold the above view
as the concept of 'self inflicted injury' would require
intention to inflict such injury and not mere
negligence of any particular degree. Doing so would
amount to invoking the principle of contributory
negligence which cannot be done in the case of
liability based on 'no fault theory'. We may in this
connection refer to judgment of this Court in United
India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sunil Kumar 2017 (13)
SCALE 652 : (AIR 2017 SC 5710) laying down that
plea of negligence of the victim cannot be allowed in
claim based on 'no fault theory' under Section 163A
of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Accordingly, we hold
Kamukayi vs Union Of India on 16 May, 2023
14. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
KAMUKAYI AND OTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND
OTHERS4 has observed at paragraph No.22 as follows:
Section 124 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Doli Rani Saha vs Union Of India on 13 April, 2023
9. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of DOLI
RANI SAHA VS. UNION OF INDIA1 in paragraph No.13
has held as under:
Sri Mahaboob Sab vs Union Of India on 7 July, 2010
10. The judgment of this Court in the case of
MAHABOOB SAB & ANOTHER VS. UNION OF INDIA2
in paragraphs No.12 & 17 has held as under:
1