Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.35 seconds)Section 438 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 44 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 439 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 71 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs Union Of India on 27 July, 2022
21. The fetter imposed by Section 45 of the PMLA in the matter of grant of bail,
having been restored, as is evident from the judgments referred to above and
also that the said fetters are equally applicable while considering grant of
anticipatory bail, it goes without saying that the twin conditions as regards
the Courts satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds for believing that
KAMAL KUMAR
2022.12.23 15:31
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
15 CRM-M-56737-2022 (O&M)
the accused is not guilty and also that the accused, if granted bail is not
likely to commit similar offence again is sine-qua-non in the matter of grant
of bail. Rather, the said conditions are required to be applied more strictly in
a case of anticipatory bail than in a case of regular bail where petitioner has
already been subjected to custodial interrogation undisputedly as custodial
interrogation is more elicitive. The present case where a huge part of
"proceeds of crime" is yet to be recovered, the custodial interrogation is
infact indispensable.
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Directorate Of Enforcement Shri Ashok ... vs Ashok Kumar Jain Directorate Of ... on 8 January, 1998
In
Directorate of Enforcement v. Ashok Kumar Jain, it was held that in economic
offences, the accused is not entitled to anticipatory bail.