Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.33 seconds)

Lalita Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 July, 2008

The issue in this case is as to which rules would be applicable in a case where dependents of deceased government employees seek compassionate relief. Two Hon'ble Division Benches have taken a view that the rules in operation at the time of death would be applicable (in the judgments of this Court titled as Lalita Sharma V. State of Haryana in CWP No.6890 of 2007 decided on 11.7.2008 and Sheela Devi V. State of Haryana and another in CWP No.8844 of 2007 decided on 22.8.2008).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 11 - J Singh - Full Document

Sheela Devi vs State Of Haryana on 2 January, 2009

The issue in this case is as to which rules would be applicable in a case where dependents of deceased government employees seek compassionate relief. Two Hon'ble Division Benches have taken a view that the rules in operation at the time of death would be applicable (in the judgments of this Court titled as Lalita Sharma V. State of Haryana in CWP No.6890 of 2007 decided on 11.7.2008 and Sheela Devi V. State of Haryana and another in CWP No.8844 of 2007 decided on 22.8.2008).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 12 - R Gupta - Full Document

Sudha Rani vs State Of Haryana on 24 September, 1997

Likewise, there are two Hon'ble Division Benches who have taken the contradictory view that the rules applicable at the date on which the case was considered would be applicable (in the judgments of this Court Kuldip Kumar V. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vittran Nigam and another reported as 2008(2)SCT 254 decided on 12.3.2008 and Sudha Rani V. State of Haryana and others reported as 2008(2) SCT 547).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 3 - R L Anand - Full Document
1