Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.28 seconds)
Mani Enterprises,, Meerut vs Assessee cites

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Gabriel India Ltd. on 15 April, 1993

21. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs. Ashish Rajpal (2009) 180 Taxman 623 (Delhi), after analyzing and considering the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT (supra), CIT vs. Max India Ltd. (2007) 295 ITR 282 and Ram Pyari Devi Sarogi vs. CIT (1968) 67 ITR 84 (SC) and the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Gee Vee Enterprises vs. ACIT (1975) 99 ITR 375 (Delhi and the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd. (supra) has laid down the parameters and principles which govern the exercise of power by the Commissioner under the provision of section 263 of the Act as under:-
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 701 - Full Document

Cit vs Max India Ltd. on 1 November, 2007

21. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs. Ashish Rajpal (2009) 180 Taxman 623 (Delhi), after analyzing and considering the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT (supra), CIT vs. Max India Ltd. (2007) 295 ITR 282 and Ram Pyari Devi Sarogi vs. CIT (1968) 67 ITR 84 (SC) and the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Gee Vee Enterprises vs. ACIT (1975) 99 ITR 375 (Delhi and the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd. (supra) has laid down the parameters and principles which govern the exercise of power by the Commissioner under the provision of section 263 of the Act as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 786 - Full Document

M/S. The Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kerala ... on 10 February, 2000

21. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs. Ashish Rajpal (2009) 180 Taxman 623 (Delhi), after analyzing and considering the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT (supra), CIT vs. Max India Ltd. (2007) 295 ITR 282 and Ram Pyari Devi Sarogi vs. CIT (1968) 67 ITR 84 (SC) and the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Gee Vee Enterprises vs. ACIT (1975) 99 ITR 375 (Delhi and the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd. (supra) has laid down the parameters and principles which govern the exercise of power by the Commissioner under the provision of section 263 of the Act as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 2080 - S S Quadri - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xiii vs Shri Ashish Rajpal on 14 May, 2009

21. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs. Ashish Rajpal (2009) 180 Taxman 623 (Delhi), after analyzing and considering the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT (supra), CIT vs. Max India Ltd. (2007) 295 ITR 282 and Ram Pyari Devi Sarogi vs. CIT (1968) 67 ITR 84 (SC) and the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Gee Vee Enterprises vs. ACIT (1975) 99 ITR 375 (Delhi and the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd. (supra) has laid down the parameters and principles which govern the exercise of power by the Commissioner under the provision of section 263 of the Act as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 110 - R Shakdher - Full Document

Rampyari Devi Saraogi vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, West ... on 1 May, 1967

21. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of CIT vs. Ashish Rajpal (2009) 180 Taxman 623 (Delhi), after analyzing and considering the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT (supra), CIT vs. Max India Ltd. (2007) 295 ITR 282 and Ram Pyari Devi Sarogi vs. CIT (1968) 67 ITR 84 (SC) and the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Gee Vee Enterprises vs. ACIT (1975) 99 ITR 375 (Delhi and the decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Gabriel India Ltd. (supra) has laid down the parameters and principles which govern the exercise of power by the Commissioner under the provision of section 263 of the Act as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 420 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next