Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.93 seconds)Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bangalore vs K.Y. Pilliah And Sons on 13 October, 1966
20.2 At the time of hearing, the Ld. DR has not brought anything on record
contrary to the finding of the Ld. CWT (A). We also find that the Ld. CWT (A)
has passed a speaking and self-explanatory order as reproduced herein
above. Therefore we concur with the finding of the Ld. CWT (A) after placing
the reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT
Vs. K.Y. Pilliah And Sons reported in 63 ITR 411 wherein it was held as
under:
Section 2 in The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Jyotindrasinhji Vikramsinhji Jadeja vs Gondal Municipality on 21 August, 1991
थायी ले खा सं . /जीआइआर सं . / PAN/GIR No. : AAXPJ8631R
(अपीलाथ# /Appellant) .. ($%यथ# / Respondent)
And
W.T.A No.02/RJT/2010
( नधा रण वष / Assessment Year : 2005-06)
A.C.W.T. बनाम/ Shri Jyotindrasinhji of
Circle-1, Vs. Gondal,
Rajkot. Darbar Gadh,
Palace,
Gondal..
Section 3 in The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
1