Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.19 seconds)
B.Valarmathi vs The Government Of Tamilnadu on 9 February, 2011 cites

Tessy John vs The Principal Commissioner And ... on 10 December, 2007

In the given circumstances, since the repealed Act in particular Section-4 thereof would run only in favour of the petitioner's case and not that of the respondents, this Court could safely conclude in line with the observation made in (Tessy John v. Principal Commr.& Commr. of Land Reforms) 2008 1 MLJ 383, to the effect that when the physical possession of the property has not been taken over from the land owner who continues to be in possession and enjoyment of the property, the land owner is entitled to have the benefit under Section 4 of the repealed Act.
Madras High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 7 - K Chandru - Full Document
1   2 Next