Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.23 seconds)Section 35 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Sale Of Goods Act, 1930
The Advocates Act, 1961
Section 38 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Tyabji, Dayabhai And Co. vs Jetha Devji And Co. on 10 March, 1927
The
Division Bench has distinguished an earlier decision of the
Bombay High Court in Tyabji Dayabhai & Co. vs. Jetha Devji
& Co. (AIR 1927 Bombay 542) wherein the English law
relating to the solicitors lien was followed. Subsequently,
a Full Bench of the Madras High Court in 1943 followed the
decision of the Division Bench. A Full Bench of the Patna
High Court in In re B.N. Advocate in the matter of Misc.
Judl.
Bar Council Of India Rules
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Shobharam And Ors on 22 April, 1966
In this context reference
can be made to the decision of this Court in State of Madhya
Pradesh vs. Shobharam and ors. (AIR 1966 SC 1910). The
words of his choice in Article 22(1) indicate that the
right of the accused to change an advocate whom he once
engaged in the same case, cannot be whittled down by that
advocate by withholding the case bundle on the premise that
he has to get the fees for the services already rendered to
the client.